Corporate Sustainability Disclosure in the Tehran Stock Exchange Using Grey Theory and Markov Models

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Professor, Department of Accounting, South Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.

2 PhD Student in Accounting, Department of Accounting, South Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.

Abstract

Objective: Corporate sustainability disclosure (CSD) has become a key mechanism for improving transparency beyond traditional financial reporting by providing stakeholders with a more comprehensive picture of firms’ economic, governance, social, and environmental performance. Such disclosure was expected to reduce information asymmetry, strengthen investor confidence, and enhance decision quality in capital markets. Given the growing relevance of sustainability reporting and the limited availability of direct sustainability disclosure metrics in Iran, this study aimed to construct a Corporate Sustainability Disclosure Index (CSDI) for firms listed on the Tehran Stock Exchange (TSE) and to forecast its time trend. The study further aimed to enhance forecasting accuracy by combining Grey forecasting with Markov chain correction, thereby offering an approach capable of capturing both trend dynamics and state-to-state transitions in disclosure levels.
Methods: A composite CSDI was developed because no single direct indicator of sustainability disclosure was available in Iranian corporate datasets. The index was constructed by integrating several dimensions that collectively reflected sustainability-related disclosure and performance: (1) economic/financial variables, (2) governance-related indicators, (3) reporting quality measures, and (4) environmental proxies. After data collection and index calculation, the time path of CSDI was forecast using the Grey Model GM(1,1), which was suitable for systems with limited or incomplete information. To improve the baseline Grey forecasts, a Markov chain framework was then employed. Specifically, firms’ disclosure levels were classified into discrete states (levels), a transition probability matrix was estimated, and Grey forecasts were adjusted using Markov transition probabilities to account for the likelihood of moving between disclosure states over time.
Results: The results indicated that the constructed CSDI exhibited an overall increasing trend across the examined period, suggesting gradual improvement in sustainability-related disclosure among TSE-listed firms. The Grey GM(1,1) model captured the upward temporal trend, while the Markov correction revealed that disclosure levels did not evolve deterministically; rather, they shifted between adjacent (and in some cases non-adjacent) states with identifiable transition dynamics. The transition probability structure suggested that firms tended to maintain their disclosure category with a measurable persistence, yet meaningful upward mobility between disclosure states occurred, consistent with a progressive disclosure trajectory. The combined Grey–Markov approach therefore provided both a smooth trend forecast and a probabilistic depiction of disclosure-level mobility.
Conclusion: The study concluded that corporate sustainability disclosure among firms listed on the TSE was improving and that disclosure evolution could be better understood through a hybrid modelling approach. Combining GM(1,1) with Markov chains supported more realistic forecasting by incorporating uncertainty and state transition behavior. This methodological integration was useful for monitoring disclosure development, identifying potential risks associated with stagnation or downward transitions, and informing managerial or regulatory strategies aimed at strengthening sustainability disclosure practices.
Innovation: This study contributed by (i) operationalizing a composite CSDI tailored to the Iranian context in the absence of a direct disclosure metric, and (ii) applying a Grey GM(1,1) model enhanced with Markov transition correction to jointly model disclosure trends and probabilistic shifts between disclosure levels in the TSE setting.

Keywords


Abdoli, Elham and Ahmadzadeh, Younes . (1404). The impact of balanced corporate sustainability reporting on profit classification change with emphasis on dimensions of stakeholder theory. Management Accounting and Auditing Knowledge, 16(61), 47-67. doi: 10.22034/jmaak.2025.24066 (In Persian)
Bushman, R. M., & Smith, A. J. (2001). Financial accounting information and corporate governance. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 32(1–3), 237–333. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-4101(01)00027-1
Clarkson, P. M., Li, Y., Richardson, G. D., & Vasvari, F. P. (2008). Revisiting the relation between environmental performance and environmental disclosure: An empirical analysis. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 33(4–5), 303–327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2007.05.003
De Villiers, C., Naiker, V., & Van Staden, C. J. (2011). The effect of board characteristics on firm environmental performance. Journal of Management, 37(6), 1636–1663. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206311411506
Dechow, P. M., Ge, W., & Schrand, C. (2010). Understanding earnings quality: A review of the proxies, their determinants, and their consequences. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 50(2–3), 344–401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2010.09.001
Dhaliwal, D. S., Li, O. Z., Tsang, A., & Yang, Y. G. (2011). Voluntary nonfinancial disclosure and the cost of equity capital: The initiation of corporate social responsibility reporting. The Accounting Review, 86(1), 59–100. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.00000005
Dilling, P. F. A., Harris, P., & Caykoylu, S. (2024). The impact of corporate characteristics on climate governance disclosure. Sustainability, 16(5), 1962. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16051962
Erben Yavuz, A., Kocaman, B. E., Doğan, M., Hazar, A., Babuşcu, Ş., & Sutbayeva, R. (2024). The impact of corporate governance on sustainability disclosures: A comparison from the perspective of financial and non-financial firms. Sustainability, 16(19), 8400. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16198400
Gray, R., Kouhy, R., & Lavers, S. (1995). Corporate social and environmental reporting: A review of the literature and a longitudinal study of UK disclosure. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 8(2), 47–77. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513579510146996
Hekmat, Hanieh, Rahmani, Ali and Mofaqeb, Samira. (1404). The effect of sustainability reporting disclosure and comparability of accounting information on profit continuity. Accounting and Auditing Reviews, 32(1), 95-116. doi: 10.22059/acctgrev.2025.374762.1008939 (In Persian)
Huang, J., Wang, D. D., & Wang, Y. (2024). Textual attributes of corporate sustainability reports and ESG ratings. Sustainability, 16(21), 9270. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16219270
Jaleh Azad Zanjani, Mohsen, Fazeli, Naghi and Faghani Makrani, Khosro. (1403). Presenting a sustainability reporting model: comparing the requirements of the Tehran Stock Exchange
with the common sustainability reporting standards in the world. Accounting and Social Benefits, 14(4), 59-90. doi: 10.22051/jaasci.2024.45546.1812 (In Persian)
Kamranian Marnani, Fatemeh and Eshaghi, Amirhossein . (1404). The impact of corporate sustainability on investment sensitivity to internal cash flow. Journal of Financial Accounting Research, (4; 9 – 77-96), -. doi: 10.22108/far.2026.145508.2134 (In Persian)
Khan, A., Muttakin, M. B., & Siddiqui, J. (2013). Corporate governance and corporate social responsibility disclosures: Evidence from an emerging economy. Journal of Business Ethics, 114(2), 207–223. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1336-0
Laskar, N. (2024). Assessing the drivers of corporate sustainability performance disclosures using the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) G4 framework. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 17(11), 513. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm17110513
Li, F. (2008). Annual report readability, current earnings, and earnings persistence. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 45(2–3), 221–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2008.02.003
Malaki, Mohammad, 1402, A Review of Corporate Sustainability Reporting Tools (SRT), 21st National Accounting Conference of Iran and 3rd International Accounting Conference of Iran (Future Research in Accounting, Sustainability Reporting and Business Resilience), Tabriz, https://civilica.com/doc/2206721 (In Persian)
Parisa Jindaluang. (2025). The impact of sustainability disclosure on financial performance: Strategic communication for enhancing transparency in Thai listed companies. Journal of Business, Innovation and Sustainability (JBIS), 20(2), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.71185/jbis.2025.277293
Said, R., Zainuddin, Y. H., & Haron, H. (2009). The relationship between corporate social responsibility disclosure and corporate governance characteristics in Malaysian public listed companies. Social Responsibility Journal, 5(2), 212–226. https://doi.org/10.1108/17471110910964496
Saraswati, E., Rumansyah, M. A., & Dewi, A. A. (2024). Materiality and stakeholder engagement in sustainability reporting: Does it matter? Business: Theory and Practice, 25(2), 397–405. https://doi.org/10.3846/btp.2024.19023
Schipper, K., & Vincent, L. (2003). Earnings quality. Accounting Horizons, 17(Suppl. 1), 97–110. https://doi.org/10.2308/acch.2003.17.s-1.97
Serafin, A. M., & Courteau, C. (2023). Corporate disclosure, ESG and green fintech in the energy industry. The Journal of World Energy Law & Business, 16(6), 473–491. https://doi.org/10.1093/jwelb/jwad018
Shekarkhah, Javad. (1404). Investigating the impact of sustainability reporting on financial performance: Applying a systematic review method. Empirical Studies in Financial Accounting, 22(88), 44-79. doi: 10.22054/qjma.2025.87299.2697 (In Persian)
  • Receive Date: 19 February 2026
  • Revise Date: 01 June 2026
  • Accept Date: 01 June 2026
  • First Publish Date: 01 June 2026
  • Publish Date: 22 May 2026